Bringing Stakeholders Along for the Ride: Towards Supporting Intentional Decisions in Software Evolution
[Context and Motivation] During elicitation, in addition to collecting requirements, analysts also collect stakeholders’ goals and the present and historical interests that motivate their goals. This information can guide the resolution of requirements conflicts, support the evolution of requirements when changes occur (e.g., environmental constraints), and inform decisions in software design. [Problem] Unfortunately, this information is rarely explicitly represented and maintained. When a stakeholder is modeled in the literature, the captured information is only part of that stakeholder’s intention (i.e., the goals and the present and historical interests that motivate those goals) and not other requirements documents. In addition, such representations of a stakeholder are not traced and kept aligned with the design and, thus, cannot be used during iterative development and in case of changes. [Principal Idea] To support engineers in making informed decisions during the design, development, and evolution of a system, we propose a framework to collect and maintain intentionality in an efficient and effortless way this information. [Contributions] To define intentionality, disambiguate it from its use in literature, and position it in relation to similar concepts (i.e., rationale and goals), we conduct a condensed systematic literature review. Based on our derived definition, we present our framework to appropriately include intentionality throughout the stages of a project and the research agenda to realize such a framework.
Tue 18 AprDisplayed time zone: Brussels, Copenhagen, Madrid, Paris change
14:00 - 15:30 | Session R3 - Requirements Communication and Conceptualization IIResearch Papers at Sitges Chair(s): Eric Knauss Chalmers | University of Gothenburg | ||
14:00 40mScientific evaluation | Requirements Engineering Issues Experienced by Software Practitioners: A Study on Stack Exchange Research Papers P: Rodrigo Spinola Virginia Commonwealth University, A: Sávio Freire Federal Institute of Ceará, A: Felipe Gomes Federal University of Bahia, A: Larissa Barbosa Federal University of Bahia, A: Thiago Souto Mendes Federal Institute of Bahia, A: Galdir Reges Salvador University, A: Rita S. P. Maciel Federal University of Bahia, A: Manoel Mendonça Federal University of Bahia, D: Victoria Sakhnini University of Waterloo | ||
14:40 20mResearch preview | Bringing Stakeholders Along for the Ride: Towards Supporting Intentional Decisions in Software Evolution Research Papers P: Alicia M. Grubb Smith College, D: Paola Spoletini Kennesaw State University, D: Rodrigo Spinola Virginia Commonwealth University | ||
15:00 20mResearch preview | Scope Determined (D) and Scope Determining (G) Requirements: A New Categorization of Functional Requirements Research Papers P: Victoria Sakhnini University of Waterloo, A: Dan Berry University of Waterloo, A: Marcia Lucena Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, A: Abhishek Dhakla University of Waterloo, D: Paola Spoletini Kennesaw State University |